The highly anticipated release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein has sparked controversy, with many expressing disappointment over the lack of new revelations. The documents, released by the Justice Department, did not contain the expected “client list” or significant new information, leading to frustration among political figures and the public.

Delayed and Incomplete Release

The Justice Department had initially promised a major release of documents connected to the disgraced financier. However, when the files were made public, they mostly consisted of Epstein’s phonebook and other known information, leaving many questioning whether key details were still being withheld.

Many conservative lawmakers and commentators took to social media to express their dissatisfaction. Representative Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., criticized the release, stating, “THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR! GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!” Similarly, Representative Thomas Massie, R-Ky., pointed out that the delayed release raised concerns about the Justice Department’s control under the current administration.

White House Controversy and Media Reactions

Adding to the controversy, several conservative influencers were seen outside the White House holding binders labeled “The Epstein Files Phase 1,” leading to speculation that a significant release was imminent. However, when the documents turned out to be underwhelming, social media erupted with frustration.

Commentators like Tony Kinnett of The Daily Signal mocked the spectacle, stating, “Pam Bondi: ‘We’re releasing the first of the Epstein files tomorrow.’ Americans: ‘Cool! Then we’ll get to read them?’ Bondi: ‘Well actually you’ll get to see fun little photo shoots of conservative personalities & influencers holding a binder!’”

Matt Walsh, a well-known conservative commentator, criticized the way the release was handled, arguing that the files should have been simply uploaded for public access rather than being treated as a staged event.

FBI and DOJ Under Scrutiny

Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed that a key reason for the delay was the FBI’s handling of the documents. She explained that she had requested the full Epstein case file before Kash Patel took over as head of the FBI. Initially, she was provided with about 200 pages—far fewer than the thousands of pages released in connection to Epstein’s former associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

“I repeatedly questioned whether this was the full set of documents responsive to my request and was repeatedly assured by the FBI that we had received the full set of documents,” Bondi wrote. She later learned that the FBI’s New York field office was still in possession of thousands of pages related to Epstein’s investigation.

Bondi has since demanded that by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, the FBI provide her office with the full and complete Epstein files, including all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and materials related to Epstein and his associates.

What Happens Next?

Despite Bondi’s demands, as of Friday afternoon, no additional files had been released, leaving many wondering whether the full extent of Epstein’s connections and dealings will ever be revealed.

Fox News Digital reached out to the Justice Department for a statement, but no official response has been given yet.

Bondi previously stated on Fox News that she expected flight logs, names, and other critical information to be part of the release. “It’s pretty sick what that man did, along with his co-defendant,” she remarked, referencing Epstein’s convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Public Demand for Transparency

The Epstein case has long been shrouded in mystery, with many suspecting that powerful individuals were involved in his crimes. The delay and lack of new information in the document release have only fueled further skepticism.

Kash Patel, the new FBI director, addressed concerns late Thursday, stating that the FBI is entering a “new era” of integrity and accountability. He promised that under his leadership, there would be no cover-ups and that any missing records would be uncovered.

“There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned. Anyone from the prior or current Bureau who undermines this will be swiftly pursued,” Patel said.

Despite these assurances, the American public remains skeptical. Many believe that unless the full Epstein files are released without redactions, questions about his powerful connections and potential cover-ups will persist.

Looking Ahead

As the demand for transparency grows, all eyes remain on the Justice Department and FBI. Will they release the full set of Epstein documents as promised, or will the public be left with more unanswered questions? Only time will tell, but for now, frustration and skepticism remain high.